The impacts, risks & oppor­tu­ni­ties are an important part of the CSRD report­ing obli­ga­ti­onwhich deser­ves spe­cial attention.
We will give you an over­view and show you what you need to bear in mind with the­se terms, which are also refer­red to coll­ec­tively as IROs. 

The IROs stand for Impacts, Risks and Opportunities.
They play a major role in dual mate­ria­li­ty and rela­te to the sus­taina­bi­li­ty topics of the ESG are­as of envi­ron­ment, social affairs and governance. 

CSRD com­pli­ance requi­res com­pa­nies not only to report on IROs, but also to mana­ge the mate­ri­al risks ari­sing from IROs.
The impacts, risks and oppor­tu­ni­ties (IROs), tog­e­ther with depen­den­ci­es, are the most important buil­ding blocks for ana­ly­zing mate­ria­li­ty and are the­r­e­fo­re essen­ti­al for CSRD risk management. 

What is dou­ble materiality? 

Dual mate­ria­li­ty looks at ESG sus­taina­bi­li­ty issues from two perspectives:

1. signi­fi­cant impacts of com­pa­nies on peo­p­le and the envi­ron­ment and

2. signi­fi­cant impacts of peo­p­le and the envi­ron­ment on companies.

Graphische Darstellung der doppelten Wesentlichkeit

While the first per­spec­ti­ve of mate­ri­al impacts is also cal­led the insi­de-out per­spec­ti­ve, the second per­spec­ti­ve repres­ents the finan­cial aspects and is cal­led the finan­cial mate­ria­li­ty or out­side-in perspective.
A com­pa­ny must report on both per­spec­ti­ves as part of CSRD com­pli­ance with regard to sus­taina­bi­li­ty issues. 

The impacts are assi­gned to the first or insi­de-out perspective.
The risks and oppor­tu­ni­ties are assi­gned to the second or out­side-in perspective. 

What is the dif­fe­rence bet­ween dual mate­ria­li­ty and mate­ria­li­ty analysis?

The two per­spec­ti­ves of dual mate­ria­li­ty are the con­cep­tu­al basis of the mate­ria­li­ty analysis.
For the mate­ria­li­ty ana­ly­sis, the two per­spec­ti­ves “insi­de-out” and “out­side-in” are split sepa­ra­te­ly, ana­ly­zed and deter­mi­ned in terms of their mate­ria­li­ty or significance.
This break­down is made into impacts, risks and oppor­tu­ni­ties (IROs).

What depen­den­ci­es are the­re in the CSRD?

Depen­den­ci­es descri­be the situa­ti­on of a com­pa­ny that is depen­dent on natu­ral, human and/or social resour­ces for its busi­ness processes.
The­se depen­den­ci­es can be diver­se, are situa­tio­nal­ly rela­ted to the indi­vi­du­al com­pa­ny and are not limi­t­ed in num­ber in the CSRD. 

Examp­les of depen­den­ci­es are

  • Natu­ral resour­ces — bee pol­li­na­ti­on for fruit growers
  • Human resour­ces — access to a spe­ci­fic group of pro­fes­sio­nals, e.g. nur­sing staff in a rural area
  • Social resour­ces — Good rela­ti­onships based on trust, e.g. with a sup­pli­er of important raw materials

What impact does the CSRD have?

The CSRD descri­bes the impacts as nega­ti­ve and posi­ti­ve effects of the com­pa­ny on peo­p­le or the envi­ron­ment in con­nec­tion with its own value chain.
The impacts are part of the first or insi­de-out perspective. 

The list of pos­si­ble impacts is not limi­t­ed, but they can be sum­ma­ri­zed well via the sus­taina­bi­li­ty topics and in par­ti­cu­lar the ESRS AR 16 list. 

Examp­les of effects are

  • Nega­ti­ve effects: Con­ta­mi­na­ti­on of ground­wa­ter through was­te­wa­ter, inci­dents of child labor in upstream stages of the value chain, loss of bio­di­ver­si­ty through soil sealing.
  • Posi­ti­ve effects: Reduc­tion of green­house gas emis­si­ons, pro­jects to increase bio­di­ver­si­ty, e.g. rena­tu­ra­ti­on measures

What risks are the­re in CSRD?

Accor­ding to the CSRD defi­ni­ti­on, risks are sus­taina­bi­li­ty-rela­ted risks with a nega­ti­ve finan­cial impact that affect cash flows, access to finan­ce or the cost of capital.
The CSRD does not limit the list of pos­si­ble risks.
The risks can also be easi­ly deter­mi­ned using the sus­taina­bi­li­ty topics, in par­ti­cu­lar the ESRS AR 16 list. 

Risks are gene­ral­ly divi­ded into phy­si­cal risks and tran­si­ti­on risks.
Phy­si­cal risks are, for exam­p­le, tho­se cau­sed by floo­ding, drought or hea­vy rainfall.
Tran­si­ti­on risks can ari­se, for exam­p­le, as a result of a shorta­ge of raw mate­ri­als, stric­ter regu­la­ti­on regar­ding the use of hazar­dous che­mi­cals, loss of repu­ta­ti­on due to une­qual tre­at­ment of employees, etc. 

What oppor­tu­ni­ties does the CSRD offer?

In the CSRD, oppor­tu­ni­ties are defi­ned as sus­taina­bi­li­ty-rela­ted oppor­tu­ni­ties with a posi­ti­ve finan­cial impact that affect the company’s cash flows, access to finan­ce or cost of capital.

The oppor­tu­ni­ties are divi­ded into the fol­lo­wing main categories:

  • Resour­ce effi­ci­en­cy, e.g. by avo­i­ding waste
  • Cost savings, e.g. through the use of fewer raw mate­ri­als in the pro­duc­tion process
  • Diver­si­fi­ca­ti­on of the busi­ness model, e.g. through addi­tio­nal sus­tainable pro­duct or ser­vice offerings
  • Repu­ta­ti­on gain, e.g. through com­mit­ment to local biodiversity

How are the depen­den­ci­es, impacts, risks and oppor­tu­ni­ties (DIROs) interrelated?

All ele­ments of the DIROs are fun­da­men­tal­ly interconnected.
They can even be inter­re­la­ted and interdependent.
Con­flic­ting objec­ti­ves can ari­se in this con­text, e.g. if the­re are social impacts when swit­ching to rene­wa­ble energies.
While the cli­ma­te gains in our exam­p­le, many peo­p­le in the coal mining area lose their jobs. 

This makes it dif­fi­cult to analyze.
In simp­le terms, howe­ver, it can be said that depen­den­ci­es and impacts are sources of risks and opportunities.
The­se in turn are exami­ned indi­vi­du­al­ly for their mate­ria­li­ty and ran­ked in order of importance. 

What is the dif­fe­rence bet­ween the impacts, risks and oppor­tu­ni­ties of CSRD and the impacts, risks and oppor­tu­ni­ties in CSRD?

The impacts, risks and oppor­tu­ni­ties in the CSRD are the most important com­pon­ents of the mate­ria­li­ty analysis. 

The effects, risks and oppor­tu­ni­ties of CSRD are mani­fold and initi­al­ly mean a hig­her bureau­cra­tic bur­den for com­pa­nies and the risk of get­ting lost in regulation.
Over time, the­re is gre­at hope that the oppor­tu­ni­ties ari­sing from trans­pa­ren­cy, data avai­la­bi­li­ty and increased resi­li­ence, for exam­p­le, will out­weigh the risks. 

Con­clu­si­on

The impacts, risks and oppor­tu­ni­ties, also known as IROs, are the core of ESG report­ing and must be deter­mi­ned, ana­ly­zed, asses­sed and repor­ted via the mate­ria­li­ty analysis.
Depen­den­ci­es, which are also part of the con­cept, do not have to be repor­ted, but are an inte­gral part of the mate­ria­li­ty ana­ly­sis and must be taken into account. 

The terms of CSRD are not always cle­ar­ly defi­ned or assignable.
It is important to pay atten­ti­on to this and to crea­te cla­ri­ty for your own company. 

Find out more about CSRD report­ing as well as the depen­den­ci­es, impacts, risks and oppor­tu­ni­ties of CSRD in our gui­de